Restorasi dan Konservasi berbasis Komunitas: Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat melalui Program Katingan Mentaya Project Kalimantan

Restorasi dan Konservasi berbasis Komunitas: Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat melalui Program Katingan Mentaya Project Kalimantan

Authors

  • Rahadyan Rahadyan
  • Sulistyary Ardiyantika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31595/peksos.v23i1.1169

Keywords:

Restoration; Conservation; Community-Based Conservation of the Katingan-Mentaya Project.

Abstract

This study explores the business concepts implemented by PT. Rimba Makmur Utama (PT. RMU) within its operational units, focuses on the Katingan Mentaya Project aimed at community-based conservation. The research employs descriptive statistical approaches alongside quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate the implementation of five principles of community-based conservation by RMU. Findings indicate that RMU has successfully established collaborative relationships with the community through partnerships and the use of the CADASTA platform. Additionally, women are identified as key agents of change through active participation in floating health posts, rattan craft training, and microfinance skill development. Mediation and compensation are implemented through activities such as Zero Burn Zero Chemical (TBTK), Agroecology Farmer School (STA), and local plant conservation initiatives. A rights-based approach is reflected in RMU's efforts to improve community sanitation infrastructure. The revitalization of traditional and local institutions is also prioritized to maintain traditional knowledge in environmental management, exemplified by the Agroecology Sustainable Farmer Cooperative and the Peatland Sustainable Farmer Group in Bamadu Village. This study illustrates RMU's contribution to introducing innovation in conservation while strengthening community participation and cultural revitalization to achieve sustainable and inclusive environmental management.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armitage, Derek, Philile Mbatha, Ella Kari Muhl, Wayne Rice, and Merle Sowman. “Governance Principles for Community-Centered Conservation in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.” Conservation Science and Practice 2, no. 2 (2020): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.160.

Brockington, D., R. Duffy, and J. Igoe. “Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas.” Earthscan, London, UK, 2010.

Ceballos, G., and P. R. Ehrlich. “The Misunderstood Sixth Mass Extinction.” Scirnece, 360(6393), 1080.2–1081., 2018. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aau0191.

Dickman, A. J. “Complexities of Conflict: The Importance of Considering Social Factors for Effectively Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflict.” Animal Conservation 13, no. 5 (2010): 458–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x.

Garnett, Stephen T, Neil D Burgess, John E Fa, Álvaro Fernández-llamazares, Zsolt Molnár, Cathy J Robinson, James E M Watson, et al. “A Spatial Overview of the Global Importance of Indigenous Lands for Conservation.” Nature Sustainability 1, no. July (2018): 369–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6.

Greiber, Thomas, Janki, Melinda, Marcos, Savaresi, Annalisa, Shelton, and Dinah. “Conservation with Justice : A Rights-Based Approach.” https://www.iucn.org/, 2009. https://www.iucn.org/resources/publication/conservation-justice-rights-based-approach.

Groenewald, Thomas. “A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 3, no. 1 (2004): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104.

Gullison, Raymond E. “Progress and Challenges in Consolidating the Management of Amazonian Protected Areas and Indigenous Territories.” Environmental Science & Policy, 2019, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13122.This.

IUCN, UNEP, and WWF. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, 1980.

Jones, Kendall R., Oscar Venter, Richard A. Fuller, James R. Allan, Sean L. Maxwell, Pablo Jose Negret, and James E.M. Watson. “One-Third of Global Protected Land Is under Intense Human Pressure.” Science 360, no. 6390 (2018): 788–91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9565.

König, Hannes J., Christian Kiffner, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt, Christine Fürst, Oliver Keuling, and Adam T. Ford. “Human–Wildlife Coexistence in a Changing World.” Conservation Biology 34, no. 4 (2020): 786–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13513.

Lestary, Dwi Fuji, Taryono Darusman, Fransisicjs A. Harsanto, Desra Arriyadi, and Ginanjar. “Understanding Natural Regeneration in Burned Tropical Peatland: A Strategy To Accelerate the Forest Recovery Process.” Biotropia 28, no. 3 (2021): 204–13. https://doi.org/10.11598/BTB.2021.28.3.1330.

Neubauer, Brian E, Catherine T Witkop, and Lara Varpio. “How Phenomenology Can Help Us Learn from the Experiences of Others,” 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2.

Ramdhan, Muhammad, and Zaenal Arifin Siregar. “PENGELOLAAN WILAYAH GAMBUT MELALUI PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DESA PESISIR DI KAWASAN HIDROLOGIS GAMBUT SUNGAI KATINGAN DAN SUNGAI MENTAYA PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TENGAH.” Jurnal Segara 14, no. 3 (December 6, 2018): 145–57. https://doi.org/10.15578/segara.v14i3.6416.

Schmidt, Paige M, and Markus J Peterson. “Biodiversity Conservation and Indigenous Land Management in the Era of Self-Determination.” Conservation Biology 23, no. 6 (2009): 1458–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01262.x.

Schuster, Richard, Ryan R. Germain, Joseph R. Bennett, Nicholas J. Reo, and Peter Arcese. “Vertebrate Biodiversity on Indigenous-Managed Lands in Australia, Brazil, and Canada Equals That in Protected Areas.” Environmental Science and Policy 101, no. January (2019): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.002.

Sukadi, Bimo Dwi Nur Romadhon, Dewa Ayu Agung Intan Pinatih, and Ni Putu Mirna Sari. “Penerapan Good Environmental Governance Pada Praktik Perdagangan Karbon Di Proyek Katingan Mentaya.” Jurnal Borneo Administrator 16, no. 3 (2020): 361–82. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i3.693.

Syamsuri, Syamsuri. “The Katingan Conservation Program for Borneo As a Sustainable Development Strategy At Katingan Regency, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.” The International Seminar Series on Regional Dynamics Proceeding, no. October 2015 (2019): 238–44. https://doi.org/10.19184/issrd.v1i1.13741.

Terborgh, John, and Carlos A. Peres. “Do Community-Managed Forests Work? A Biodiversity Perspective.” Jpurnal Land 6, no. 22 (2017): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6020022.

Travers, Henry, Lucy J. Archer, Geoffrey Mwedde, Dilys Roe, Julia Baker, Andrew J. Plumptre, Aggrey Rwetsiba, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. “Understanding Complex Drivers of Wildlife Crime to Design Effective Conservation Interventions.” Conservation Biology 33, no. 6 (2019): 1296–1306. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13330.

Yulianda, Yoga, and Erman Sumirat. “Early Mover Chasing an Opportunity : A Case Study of a Candidate of Redd + Indonesia Project Developer” 2, no. 16 (2013): 2020–26.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-23

How to Cite

Rahadyan, R., & Ardiyantika, S. . (2024). Restorasi dan Konservasi berbasis Komunitas: Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat melalui Program Katingan Mentaya Project Kalimantan: Restorasi dan Konservasi berbasis Komunitas: Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat melalui Program Katingan Mentaya Project Kalimantan. Pekerjaan Sosial, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.31595/peksos.v23i1.1169

Issue

Section

Peksos