Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 184 Download : 151

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to provide an overview of the evidence in line with whether or not community
participation and perceptions of the Sauyunan BUMDes work program in Cinangsi Village, Cibogo
District, Regency. This research approach is descriptive and quantitative. According to the research,
the medium category dominated community participation in the Sauyunan BUMDes work program in
terms of involvement in the planning process (44.4%) and involvement in the implementation process
(44.7%). Additionally, it emerged from the research that the medium category of the attitude indicator
(33.6%), expectations (31.7%), motivation (35.4%), perceived object (34.1%), work program facilities
(35.9%), and work program atmosphere (38.9%) dominated people's perceptions of work programs.
Even though the moderate category dominates for all indicators of the variables, the less category also
exists in each indicator with a number that can also be considered not small and sufficient to approach
the value of the number of moderate categories in each indicator. Such a state of perception and
participation shows a parallel between this perception and participation and the condition of BUMDes,
which experience much underdevelopment starting from dim management, vacuum, and stagnation in
the types of BUMDes businesses and not supporting facilities and atmosphere. Further, it can be
concluded that H0: "Community participation in the Sauyunan BUMDes Work Program is mostly from
the low category, and most public perceptions are from the less category about the BUMDes Sauyunan
Work Program" can be rejected, and H1: Community participation in the Sauyunan BUMDes Work
Program and public perceptions of the Sauyunan BUMDes Work Program have the highest number in
the moderate category, which is acceptable.
Key Words : Participation, Perception, Community, Sauyunan BUMDes Work Program, BUMDes

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Adi, Isbandi Rukminto. (2007). Perencanaan
  2. Partisipatoris Berbasis Asset Komunitas:
  3. dari Pemikiran Menuju Penerapan.
  4. Depok: FISIP UI Press
  5. Bintarto,R. (1977). Pengantar Geografi Kota,
  6. Yogyakarta: Spring
  7. Djalal, Fasli dan Supriadi, Dedi. (2001).
  8. Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Konteks
  9. Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Adicita
  10. Karya Nusa.
  11. Irwanto. (2002). Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: PT.
  12. Prehallindo
  13. Firmansyah, Ade (2021). Persepsi Masyarakat
  14. Terhadap Pengaruh Badan Usaha Milik
  15. Desa (BUMDes) Syariah Kembang
  16. Setanjung dalam Pengembangan
  17. Ekonomi Masyarakat di Desa Tanjung
  18. Medan, Kecamatan Tambusai Utara,
  19. Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. Tugas Akhir.
  20. Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan
  21. Kota, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Islam
  22. Riau, Pekanbaru.
  23. Gunawan,Wan Yendri. (2014). Kontribusi
  24. Usaha Perkebunan Nenas Pemerintah
  25. Kabupaten Siak dalam Meningkatkan
  26. Pendapatan Ekonomi Masyarakat
  27. Menurut Perspektif Ekonomi Islam.
  28. Riau : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan
  29. Syarif Kasim.
  30. Harahap, Sofyan. (2001). Sistem Pengawasan
  31. Manajemen. Jakarta: Penerbit Quantum.
  32. Hayati, E., & Bariroh, K. (2021). Effect
  33. Of BUMDes on Increasing PADes in
  34. Blawi Village, Karangbinangun District,
  35. Lamongan Regency. Enrichment :
  36. Journal of Management, 11(2), 253-257.
  37. Kusuma, H., & Purnamasari, N. (2016).
  38. Membangun Gerakan Desa Wirausaha.
  39. Diakses dari
  40. http://penabulucooperative.org/wpconten
  41. t/uploads/ 2016/04/Gerakan-DesaWirausaha-Baseline-Research.pdf.
  42. Pratiwi, E (2019). Persepsi dan Partisipasi
  43. Masyarakat Terhadap Penerapan
  44. Program Kerja BUMDes Dwi Amertha
  45. Sari di Desa Jinengdalem Persepsi dan
  46. Partisipasi Masyarakat terhadap
  47. Penerapan Program Kerja BUMDes Di
  48. Amertha Sari di Desa Jinengdalem.
  49. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha
  50. Robbins SP, dan Judge. (2002). Perilaku
  51. Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  52. Sompie, Jilly Gravilla. (2014).
  53. Entrepreneurship dan Pembangunan
  54. Daerah (Studi Pada Sektor Industri
  55. Pengolahan Ikan Kota Bitung, Sulawesi
  56. Utara). Salatiga: Universitas Kristen
  57. Satya Wacana.
  58. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian
  59. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.
  60. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  61. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian
  62. Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung:
  63. Alfabeta
  64. Undang Undang No 6 Tahun 2014
  65. Peraturan Presiden No 11 Tahun 2021.
  66. Walgito, Bimo. (2004). Pengantar Psikologi
  67. Umum. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
  68. Wihandoko, Agung (2015). Persepsi dan
  69. Tingkat Partisipasi Masyarakat pada
  70. Program Nasional Pemberdayaan
  71. Masyarakat Mandiri (PNPM Mandiri) di
  72. Kabupaten Mesuji (Studi Kasus
  73. Kecamatan Tanjung Raya). Tesis.
  74. Lampung: Program Pascasarjana
  75. Magister Ilmu Ekonomi, Universitas
  76. Lampung